With elections behind us, attention now turns to the actions of outgoing governments in their final days. The so-called “lame duck” period often comes with a mix of activity—some of it meaningful, some of it questionable—as leaders prepare to hand over the reins. Ideally, this period is marked by a focus on a smooth transition of power, respecting the will of the electorate as represented by the incoming officials. Unfortunately, this standard is not always upheld, and some actions merit closer scrutiny.

This year, Salt Lake County voters elected a historic group of new council members, including the first naturalized citizen (R), two first Hispanic members (R, D), and the first Black female member (D). These individuals, having committed to public service and begun preparing for their new roles, are poised to bring fresh perspectives to the council. Yet, in an unexpected and controversial move, the outgoing council voted on the very day election results were certified to defund the office staff traditionally allocated to its members.

For years, each council member has been supported by a staff assistant/adviser—a role that enables them to perform their part-time duties effectively. The outgoing council’s decision removes this resource for the incoming members while preserving existing resources for some returning members and funding significant staff assistance for the mayor’s office. This decision has raised concerns about prudence, accountability and the council’s ability to serve as an effective legislative body.

As a fiscal conservative, I have consistently supported responsible budgeting and efforts to provide tax relief for our residents. However, this action, framed as a cost-saving measure, does not reflect true fiscal discipline. While the council cut a small fraction of the budget to eliminate these advisors, it simultaneously authorized nearly $2 million for mayoral deputies and advisers, some earning significantly more than the eliminated council staff. Such choices highlight a troubling imbalance in priorities and governmental powers.

In the past decade, the county budget has doubled—from $1 billion to $2 billion—despite a shrinking direct service population. This growth in spending, coupled with the weakening of the council’s legislative capacity, raises questions about governance and accountability. A strong, well-supported council is essential to provide a necessary check on executive power and to advocate for meaningful budget reforms.

I welcome the new council members and am confident in their ability to serve our community. However, the actions taken to limit their resources before they even take office set a concerning precedent. Salt Lake County residents deserve a government that prioritizes transparency, appropriate checks and balances, and real fiscal responsibility—not decisions that undermine the principles of good governing and effective representation.